Nearly 100 Attend Coalbed Strategy Meeting
by Michele Barlow
Imagine the roadside beauty
of the Powder River Basin: mixed-grass prairie intermingled with Wyoming
big sagebrush, streams lined with plains cottonwoods, pronghorn antelope
and beef cattle grazing an expansive range, unsettled space between ranch
headquarters and prosperous cities. These are my childhood images, largely
formulated during the thousands of bus trips from my family’s cattle ranch
to Gillette’s public schools. Fast-forward several decades and the familiar
basin landscape of my youth is now criss-crossed with myriad activities
associated with coalbed methane (CBM) development.
Conference kick-off
On June 23 in Sheridan, runaway
CBM development was addressed by a experienced panel of scientists, ranchers
and WOC’s staff attorney at a conference jointly hosted by the Powder River
Basin Resource Council (PRBRC) and WOC. Nearly 100 conference goers were
greeted by Dan Heilig, WOC’s executive director, and Pennie Vance, a PRBRC
board member.
Dan focused on the conference
objective: "WOC and PRBRC believe that strong and informed citizen action
is the best way to halt degradation of Wyoming’s basin ecosystems in the
face of unfettered CBM development."
Pennie recalled her early-morning
overflight of local CBM projects. "If the scarring and degradation of the
Pilch Ranch is indeed a portent of things to come," she told the audience,
"I personally am more painfully alarmed that ever." Pennie was among 22
meeting participants who took to the air that morning with LightHawk, a
nonprofit organization that uses fly-overs to educate citizens about land
use practices throughout the Western Hemisphere.
Next, Patricia Clark, a fourth-generation
rancher in the Pumpkin Buttes area south of Gillette, captivated the audience
with a narrated slide show depicting one year of CBM development on her
ranch. Patricia is currently awaiting the results of soils and water quality
tests. She is worried that if high sodium and bicarbonate levels are revealed,
current plant communities will be overwhelmed by sodium-tolerant plants
that may be less palatable to livestock and wildlife, or even worse, that
soils may become so damaged that very few plants of any kind will survive.
She told the audience that she is also very concerned about the impacts
of CBM-produced waters on hay meadows, calving pastures and downstream
landowners.
Panel highlights
Bern Hinckley, a hydrogeologist
from Laramie, introduced the panel session with an overview of CBM activity
in Wyoming and a summary of opportunities for citizens to engage and influence
state and federal agency decisionmakers.
Walt Merschat, a Casper geochemist
and advocate for responsible minerals development, described his past work
mapping coalbed methane venting in Gillette’s notorious Rawhide Village
subdivision as well as a residential neighborhood in the San Juan Basin
of Colorado. After addressing the critical issue of aquifer dewatering
and the loss of subsurface structure, Walt warned that coalbed fires may
be ignited in the Powder River Basin (PRB), based on his familiarity with
five coalbed fires in Colorado.
Carol Endicott, a stream
ecologist with Confluence Consulting, Inc., of Bozeman, Montana, began
her remarks by admitting that the impacts of CBM development on stream
health have not been adequately studied, but she listed the potential positive
and negative effects of produced CBM waters on stream habitats and aquatic
life. To assess water quality and overall stream health, Carol strongly
endorsed biological monitoring (a survey of fish, aquatic invertebrates
and diatoms) as preferable to studies of water chemistry or effluent toxicity.
The primary advantage of
biological monitoring ("biomonitoring"), Carol explained, is that aquatic
organisms integrate the physical, chemical and biological conditions of
a stream segment over time, in marked contrast to water chemistry analyses
which provide only a "snapshot" of water quality conditions. According
to Carol, biomonitoring can also be less expensive than laboratory-intensive
water quality analyses.
Dr. Larry Munn, a University
of Wyoming soils scientist, discussed the interface between PRB soils and
two CBM water quality issues: salinity (a measure of dissolved salts in
water) and sodicity (a measure of sodium content of water). Low-to-moderate
salinity levels reduce plant production and restrict water availability.
High salinity levels are directly toxic to plants, create severe water
availability problems and generate vegetation changes and bare soil.
Simply put, salt in the soil
increases the energy required for a plant to take up water, so less energy
is available for leaf growth and seed development. On the issue of sodicity
or the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), if sodium ions displace too many
other ions (e.g., magnesium, calcium) on soil particles, these particles
will separate, causing poor water infiltration and increased runoff and
erosion. In his concluding comments, Dr. Munn warned that problems related
to salinity and sodicity, "get worse with time and are hard to fix."
A disheartening tale
Nancy Sorenson ranches in northern
Campbell County and set the stage by characterizing her pioneer family’s
agricultural practices and value system. "We practice a form of sustained
agriculture," she told the audience. "We attempt to benefit the entire
system, environmentally, culturally and economically, so that 50 or 100
years from now the land will be able to support the same population at
least as well as it does now."
With that backdrop, Nancy
drew the audience in with her prepared (and occasionally comic) remarks.
"Like almost every rancher
in northern Campbell County," she said, "we are chronically short of two
things: water and money. So when we first started hearing rumors of methane
development in our area, we were optimistic that some of our shortages
might be addressed. At that time, about two-and-a-half years ago, we did
not realize the problems that might occur. We didn’t know that well sites
could be located every 40 acres, and that two or three wells could be drilled
at each site. Most of all, we didn’t understand that Wyoming was open for
business at discounted rates, and that the state would leave the surface
user and the operators to sort legal and environmental issues out for themselves,
or that existing regulations would be interpreted for maximum benefit to
the CBM industry."
Next, Nancy told a disheartening
story about working with State Lands Office personnel and CBM company representatives
on development of a state school section. After long negotiations and signing
a weak surface use agreement (designed to set compensation and guide CBM
activities), the company is now blatantly violating the terms of the agreement.
However, Nancy was careful not to make sweeping generalizations.
"We have not always had problems
working with other companies in the industry," she said. "We have successfully
negotiated at least seven separate agreements for CBM. Most were settled
in days."
However, she noted, mineral
owners have an overwhelming advantage over surface owners. Another problem,
she told the audience, "is the state’s unwillingness to protect its own
citizens from coercive out-of-state corporations who believe they can do
anything they want to get their minerals. I often equate the gas industry
to a shark: it is just a machine designed to do one thing only. One cannot
really blame it for its mindless habits. The state, on the other hand,
is the body elected to protect its citizens from such uncontrolled business.
So while I am angry at what one CBM company is doing to me and my family,
I am more angry at our state officials who are standing by and encouraging
this behavior."
Nancy concluded her remarks
by exhorting her fellow ranchers to stand firm against coercive industry
and state policies. "Ranching in Wyoming is a rare privilege," she said.
"It carries with it a great responsibility. Surface users need to be strong
in the face of an industry and a state that is apparently indifferent to
the environment and the culture."
Mobilizing for change
Tom Darin, WOC staff attorney
and director of public lands and resources, concluded panelists’ remarks
by stressing that each CBM well located on state or private land requires
three state permits (from the Department of Environmental Quality, the
State Engineer’s Office and the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission) and
a fourth permit, from the Bureau of Land Management, if it is located on
federal land.
To transform reckless extraction
of Wyoming’s CBM resources into responsible development, Tom emphasized
that blocking permits at just one agency substantially slows CBM activity
and allows concerned individuals and groups to mobilize for changes in
public policy. Tom also summarized the array of legal initiatives being
pursued by WOC and PRBRC at both the state and federal levels. (See accompanying
articles.)
The final hour of the morning
was arguably the high point of the meeting: a lively question-and-answer
session, during which ranchers and conservationists queried the panelists
at length. We then adjourned the conference to enjoy a buffet lunch and
visit with old friends and new acquaintances.
Harkening back to the tedious
bus rides of my rural youth, I rediscover a card from Helen Haagensen,
that reads, "All your kindness to me in the past is greatly appreciated.
I will not be your bus driver next year. Hope you will like the driver
in the future. Have a coke and cheeseburger on me."
Thoughtful words and actions
by committed individuals can make all the difference in the world. To all
the concerned citizens who are working to ensure responsible CBM development:
Thanks! We owe you many, many Cokes and cheeseburgers. |