WOC and EPA Question SF 147 Impacts on Wyoming
by Steff Kessler
One of the most controversial bills introduced in the 1999 session of
the State Legislature was SF 147, "Brownfields — Corrective Action Requirements."
Pushed by BP-Amoco, the bill was designed to relieve that company of its
full responsibilities for cleaning up its polluted defunct refinery in
downtown Casper. (For more information about brownfields programs and legislation,
see the Winter 1999 issue of Frontline.)
SF 147 first surfaced at a Casper Chamber of Commerce luncheon, when
area state legislators were asked to support the bill to help out the Amoco
Reuse Joint Powers Board. The bill would allow contaminated properties
to be zoned industrial or commercial, permit contaminants to be left in
place in perpetuity and restrict the future use of the properties — forever.
Around the WOC office, we reacted to this horrifying piece of legislation
by dubbing SF 147 the "sacrifice zone creation act" and the "oncologist
full employment act."
WOC filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and obtained in response a letter that EPA Region
8 Director Bill Yellowtail had written to Governor Geringer regarding the
enormous problems with SF 147. In his four-page letter, Yellowtail outlined
how the bill conflicted with several federal laws, including the hazardous
waste law (RCRA), the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act.
In the strongest language we’ve ever seen come from EPA, Yellowtail
indicated that SF 147 threatened the state’s ability to continue to administer
these federal programs:
"My staff and I are very concerned about the
effects of this bill on the State of Wyoming’s continued ability to implement
key environmental programs, and have highlighted some of the more significant
concerns in this letter. In order to retain primacy, state programs must
be consistent with and equivalent to their counterpart Federal programs.
This bill, as proposed, brings these requirements clearly into question."
Despite EPA’s warning, Governor Geringer allowed the bill to become
law. In response, WOC filed objections with EPA during a public comment
opportunity on a routine revision to the state’s hazardous waste program.
Although there was nothing specific in the package of proposed revisions
that the state submitted to EPA for approval in 1998, WOC believed that
SF 147 had changed everything. We stated that, in light of the bill’s passage,
the current revisions fail to provide complete and accurate information
regarding Wyoming’s Hazardous Waste program, and that to approve program
revisions now would mislead the public about the adequacy of the program.
Somewhat surprisingly, EPA agreed! The agency withdrew its routinely
automatic approval of Wyoming’s revisions and reopened the public comment
opportunity, stating that it will hold a public hearing if necessary.
WOC members can help us work with EPA to hold the state’s feet to the
fire over problems with SF 147.
|